Vancouver Canucks: 5 Reasons Why Olli Juolevi Was a Great Pick
Not everyone in Vancouver Canucks Nation is happy with Olli Juolevi. But you have no reason not to be.
The Vancouver Canucks were one of the teams that sparked many rumors in the final days leading up to the 2016 NHL Draft. That was mostly because GM Jim Benning likes to let fans know what he thinks, what he is doing, and what will be next. He just seemed to change his mind a lot.
It all started with Benning stating he was looking at a defenseman for their first-round pick, when they were still in playoff contention. Once he knew where his team would pick, however, he noted that picking a forward at five is more realistic, because the top-six players in this draft are forwards. Then, after talking to his scouting staff for weeks, Benning changed his mind once again — there was a defenseman in his top six, perhaps even top five.
Today we know, Jim Benning had London Knights defenseman Olli Juolevi ranked fifth on his list. The whole thing probably looked like this:
- F Auston Matthews
- F Patrik Laine
- F Jesse Puljujarvi
- F Pierre-Luc Dubois
- D Olli Juolevi
- F Matthew Tkachuk
As so often, the Canucks managed to miss out on exactly the four players they would have liked the most, despite ranking Matthew Tkachuk, who was rumored to be the Edmonton Oilers’ favorite at No. 4, at No. 6. Whether Edmonton had Tkachuk ranked ahead of Pierre-Luc Dubois and Juolevi didn’t even matter in the end, as the Columbus Blue Jackets went a little bit off the board, leaving Jesse Puljujarvi for the Oilers.
Many Canucks fans would have preferred Puljujarvi, Dubois or Tkachuk over Juolevi, but there is reason to believe Benning made the perfect call. I am not saying Tkachuk would have been a bad pick, but only that Juolevi was a great one.
Here are five reasons why!
Next: BPA
1. Best Player Available
Should a team draft the best player available or make their pick according to a positional need? That question comes up year after year and, while most people agree that drafting the best player makes the most sense, teams make different decisions year after year. At three, Jesse Puljujarvi would have been the best player available, but the Blue Jackets wanted to fill the void that was left by Ryan Johansen, whom they had traded to the Nashville Predators for D-man Seth Jones.
With Pierre-Luc Dubois off the board, the Canucks had to rethink their BPA vs. positional need strategy. Dubois likely would have been the best available player at No. 5, and he would also fill the major need for a post-Sedin top-line center. But between Matthew Tkachuk and Olli Juolevi, who is the better player and who fills the bigger need?
It seems like the left wing is one of Vancouver’s biggest current needs. Once Daniel Sedin retires or declines, there won’t be much talent left on the position, at least not behind Sven Baertschi. But, the Canucks are also lacking defensemen with No. 1 or at least top-pairing potential. So in that regard, it is probably a tie between Tkachuk and Juolevi.
At the end of the day, the Canucks simply decided Juolevi was the best player available. Defensemen with top-pairing potential don’t grow on trees. The Edmonton Oilers have been trying to find one for about a decade now, but despite several rumors, they haven’t been able to get a deal done. If you want a top-pairing defenseman, you likely have to develop one yourself.
The Canucks will do just that, and despite a lack of physicality, Juolevi has top-pairing potential. Oliver Ekman Larsson and Nicklas Lidstrom are proof that offensive ability and a non-physical defensive game can take you very far in this league. This doesn’t mean Tkachuk is a bad player, it just means Vancouver views Juolevi as the better prospect.
Next: MVP
4. Great Person
The reason why interviews are a thing at the NHL Draft Combine is that teams want to make sure a player is driven and confident enough to make the NHL, but also that he fits in their organization. Olli Juolevi had a good interview with the Canucks and, while the same can be said about Matthew Tkachuk, the Canucks are sure they added a first-class individual to their organization.
#Canucks Juolevi a very personable kid. Had a couple of good lines for the media. Confident, but not arrogant in any way.
— Jeff Paterson (@patersonjeff) June 25, 2016
In today’s NHL, everything is about numbers. If the numbers are good, the player is good. If the numbers are bad, the player is bad. It’s that simple.
However, intangibles still play an important part in draft selections, whether you like it or not. If you compose your roster of the 25 most skilled players in the league but they are all idiots who have the IQ of a rock, you won’t win a lot of hockey games.
Teambuilding is important; it might not be quantifiable right away. But it will be eventually. You won’t get a “relative mood impact for percentage” or anything like that, but you will see if you picked the right people for your roster once they start winning games — or not.
Olli Juolevi combines top-level potential with a great personality. What more could you possibly want?
Next: Immediate Impact