Vancouver Canucks: 5 Takeaways from Year-End Press Conference

The Vancouver Canucks year-end press conference was quite interesting to watch. Here are five takeaways.

The postseason is where the fun starts — even for the Vancouver Canucks. Okay, we only get to watch all-American playoffs and the World Championship instead of Canucks hockey, but speculating about what could and will be is also a lot of fun.

Thanks to the Canucks’ year-end press conference, we have quite a bit to talk about. Almost every player talked to the media on Tuesday, but the really interesting part was when general manager Jim Benning and head coach Willie Desjardins sat down on the podium. The players had some cool stuff to say, of course, but Benning is the one in charge when we are talking about the offseason.

Unfortunately, Benning did not reveal any of his offseason strategies other than the usual “we’ll explore every possibility” talk. But, he did talk about what he thinks of the club’s young players, what could happen with his unsigned college free agents, and what he expects to get out of the 2016 NHL Draft.

Here you can find the full press conference:

And here are five important takeaways!

Next: Takeaway #1

Benning Thinks Vancouver is Prepared for Post-Sedin Era

Henrik Sedin and Daniel Sedin have been the face of the franchise for many years and they likely will be until they retire. However, the twins will turn 36 this summer and the Canucks need to think about the future. Even if the Sedins continue to play until they are 40, it would probably be best to have them in a middle-six role sooner or later, and find players for a new top line.

As Benning noted in the press conference, he is confidence that the club basically has the new top line in the system already.

We started that process. I just came back from Tampa Bay and watched Brock Boeser play. He could potentially be a No. 1line player for us. (…) If we were to stay in the top three (at the draft), we’re going to get a No. 1 line player there. (…) Our goal is to draft and develop our next group of core players that this team is going to win with going forward for a long time.

If the Canucks end up drafting in the top three, it looks like they really might get that top line set with Brock Boeser and one of Auston Matthews, Patrik Laine and Jesse Puljujarvi. In addition, Bo Horvat, Jake Virtanen and Jared McCann should be top-six players in the future.

If Vancouver falls out of that top three, they might take a defenceman instead. They could still go for a forward, but the top tier of Matthews, Laine and Puljujarvi is a big step ahead of guys like Pierre-Luc Dubois and Matthew Tkachuk.

Whatever happens, the club has a long way to go in forming a new top six without the Sedins. Benning is right, though, the Canucks’ system is and will be as well prepared for that time as it possibly can.

Next: Takeaway #3

Embed from Getty Images

Misconceptions about Draft Comments

Speaking of the draft, Jim Benning has mentioned that he wanted to take a defenceman in this year’s NHL draft unless there is a forward available who is too got not to pick. At the year-end press conference, he explained the actual background that led to the comment.

At the time, the Canucks were still in legitimate playoff contention. They struggled mightily, but thanks to the division they play in and some odd surprise wins, they were always a contender for a playoff spot. Hence, Benning expected to get a pick somewhere in the middle of the first round.

Now, behind the top three, there is a first drop-off. What follows is a bunch of equally talented players, both forwards and defencemen, who project to be drafted in the top 10. Behind that, however, it starts to get hard to project what players could become.

Related:Early 7-Round Mock Draft

In other words, selecting a defenceman who is perhaps ranked 20th in draft rankings, with something like the 12th-overall selection would not be a terrible choice. In the top three, however, things are different.

“Things have changed now,” Benning explained. “As of today, we are at three and we will take the best player available.”

The best player could be anyone. No matter who it turns out to be, Benning is making the right call.

The top-three forwards are too good to pass up, but after that, Jakob Chychrun, Olli Juolevi, Pierre-Luc Dubois or Matthew Tkachuk would all be terrific choices.

Next: Takeaway #4

Embed from Getty Images

Impact Player Could Come in at Draft

It is no secret that the top three of this year’s draft features professional players who are playing huge roles for their respective European clubs. Jim Benning is convinced either one of the trio could make an impact as early as next season:

“If we are picking in the top three, I believe the top-three players can step right in and play in the NHL next year and be players who can contribute.”

More from The Canuck Way

• Which team won the Bo Horvat trade?
• What to expect from newcomers Anthony Beauvillier, Aatu Räty
• Back to the future: How the skate uniforms became a regular Canucks’ feature night
• Canucks kick off 2023 with disappointing 6-2 loss to Islanders
• 2nd period penalty trouble sinks Canucks in 4-2 loss against Winnipeg

He is right that all three players could make an impact, but that does not guarantee anything for next season, even if the Canucks end up picking in the top three. Coming from Europe, Matthews, Laine and Puljujarvi will all be eligible to play in the AHL. While Matthews seems to be a middle-six NHL centre already, especially because he grew up playing in North America, giving Laine or Puljujarvi some time at the AHL level could certainly be a good decision.

There are obviously players like 2013 second-overall pick Aleksander Barkov, who jump right into the NHL and make an immediate impact. However, playing in the AHL has seldom hurt a player’s development.

Recent examples are Toronto Maple Leaf William Nylander and Colorado Avalanche Mikko Rantanen.

Nylander stayed in Sweden for the first half of his draft+1 season but joined the Toronto Marlies for the second half. He spent the majority of this season in the AHL as well, and now has a career total of 32 goals and 77 points in 74 games — ready to make an impact at the NHL level. For the Maple Leafs, Nylander scored six goals and added seven assists in 22 contests.

Rantanen, on the other hand, came right over to North America following the draft. He only had nine goals and 28 points in 56 games in his draft year in Finland, but became the San Antonio Rampage’s top scorer this season. He recorded 23 goals and 59 points in 50 games.

As opposed to Nylander, Rantanen has not been able to record his first NHL point yet, but he looks close to NHL-ready as well. Growing into a leader in the AHL before going to the NHL is certainly not a bad thing.

Next: Takeaway #5

There Will Be no Goalie Controvery Anytime Soon

Benning was asked what he will tell prospect goalie Thatcher Demko if Jacob Markstrom looks like the starter of the future. After all, Demko projects to be an elite starter as well. The GM had a fitting response.

If (Demko) decides to sign with us now, he is going to have to spend some time developing his game into the pro game and into a No. 1 goalie at some point, too. (…) Goalies develop in dog years almost, we have to be patient with him.

Goalies develop in dog years. Sounds about right. Indeed, goaltenders tend to take much more time to develop than skaters.

One example is Anaheim Ducks goalie John Gibson. The American made his NHL debut aged 20 and is now in his third professional season. But, he still spent time in the American Hockey League this year and is just starting to turn into a starter.

Braden Holtby of the Washington Capitals is one of the best goaltenders in the league today. He started his professional career aged 20 as well, but it took him three years to become the starter for the club.

Next: Canucks Facing Tough Draft Decisions

Now, three years are obviously not much. However, Markstrom will get his shot at the starting position and Demko will have at least three years to develop and be brought along slowly.

Dog years are a bit of an exaggeration, but we get the point.